There are a variety of opinions in the community about what, if anything, should replace the cross on Mount Tzouhalem that was cut down by vandals in July.
The Municipality of North Cowichan has received a number of emails and letters on the issue, with some calling for the cross to be replaced, while others called it an eyesore while it was in place.
One letter called the cross a “billboard for God” and the writer was sorry that it wasn’t responsibly removed by council, even though the land on which it stood is actually owned by the Nature Conservancy of Canada, many years ago for “the eyesore that it was”.
“While some may think it vandalism, I am very grateful to whomever it was who took care of it,” the letter said.
The white steel cross that has overlooked Cowichan from a cliff on the mountain since the late 1980s was removed by unknown individuals sometime in mid-July.
RELATED STORY: CROSS THAT OVERLOOKED COWICHAN VALLEY FROM MOUNT TZOUHALEM CUT DOWN
To date, no one has claimed responsibility for cutting the cross down, but discussion on social media at the time had raised the possibility that it was cut down in reaction to the discoveries earlier this summer of hundreds of unmarked graves at former residential school sites, including at Penelakut Island, off the coast of Chemainus.
RELATED STORY: MORE THAN 160 UNMARKED GRAVES FOUND NEAR FORMER RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS ON PENELAKUT
Another letter to North Cowichan suggested involving the community by having people vote on what they would like to see replace the cross.
“Get local artists involved and have a winner top the mountain,” the letter said.
Another letter suggested that the cross be re-erected as an educational symbol damning a sad, ongoing chapter in the nation’s history.
At a council meeting in August, North Cowichan Coun. Kate Marsh said, while she is aware that the property where the cross stood is not municipal land, she would like to see something other than a cross placed there.
“Given the heartbreaking grief our First Nations are going through right now, I think that any replacement, if there ever is to be one, ought to be symbolic of a future together and united rather than a reminder of a torturous and unequal past,” she said. “I want to head off any motion to place another cross up there. I certainly wouldn’t vote for it because I believe it would cause some among our First Nations more heartache.”
robert.barron@cowichanvalleycitizen.comLike us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter
