Class composition far outranks increased wages and benefits

Teachers who say they are striking "for the kids" don't mean it when they want more wages and benefits.

Editor: I have a couple of thoughts on Nicola Gorseth’s well-written piece “Class composition does matter,” (The Times, June 19).

First, I find it a bit disturbing that a seven-year-old is wondering why the premier hates teachers.  It sounds like she’s only hearing a very biased part of the story from her teacher mother.

My other thought is this. I think if you were to poll those of us classed as non-teachers and taxpayers, we would be in agreement that class composition is the number one problem in our schools and needs to be addressed.

I just don’t understand how striking for more wages and increased benefits is going to solve the problem.  This is not about the kids.  Stop pretending that is.

John Atchison,

Langley

Langley Times