To the editor:
I am disappointed to see our 100 Mile House mayor and members of the chamber of commerce showing their support for the New Prosperity mine proposal (“Late applicants granted interested party status,” page A5, March 13 Free Press).
They seem to be expecting a huge economic benefit from the mine, if it were to go ahead. I don’t share their optimism about benefits from this mine.
The proposed mine site is a low grade copper/gold deposit, located next to Fish Lake in the Chilcotin. The mine seems economically marginal.
If it were to proceed, jobs would be temporary, 20 years or less. Once the mine closes, there would be a permanent impact on what is now an area with productive fish and wildlife values.
Fish Lake and Fish Creek, where the mine would be constructed, flow into the Taseko River, which is habitat for salmon and trout.
Importantly, I believe that local First Nations do not support the mine.
Like the mayor and the chamber of commerce, I want 100 Mile House to thrive and prosper. But this temporary, environmentally destructive and marginally economic mine is not the answer, in my opinion.
Hugh Thomas
100 Mile House
