The discussion over the amalgamation (or reunification) of the two Langleys is moving to a new level, with the formation of the Langley Reunification Association and its petition efforts this summer.
The association is not pushing to have the two Langleys join together again, after a divorce that has thus far lasted 56 years. What it is pushing for is an an independent study of the merits and detriments of once again joining the two Langleys. It wants the study to be authorized by both councils, and done in as impartial a fashion as possible.
It wisely recognizes that simply asking for such a study won’t make it happen. The two councils will not react unless there is significant public interest in such a study. Thus the association is setting up booths at most large events in Langley this summer, starting with the Canada Day celebration at McLeod Park. Volunteers will ask residents of the City and Township to sign separate petitions for each municipality, asking the respective councils to agree to an impartial study.
It will have no trouble getting signatures from Township residents, most of whom cannot understand why there are two Langleys. It will be more challenging in the City.
Langley City is known for offering a high level of municipal services to residents, and the administration of the City and council is running smoothly. Many City residents will say “If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it.”
The City also has the unique advantage of having ongoing revenue from the casino, which council is using to pay for infrastructure improvements and capital projects. This frees the City from having to borrow money. At present, that revenue is spent within the City. If there was one Langley, it would be spread over a wider area.
However, City residents shouldn’t let those concerns stop them from signing the petition. An independent study would clear the air on this issue, and should show if there really would be any benefit in reunification for City residents.
If the benefits are minimal, it is unlikely the matter will go any further. An impartial study would be welcome, because it would end conjecture and provide facts.
