Vehicles belonging to White Rock Coun. Helen Fathers were damaged Friday in what police are describing as a “vicious attack.”There is speculation the vandalism is linked to recent controversy that followed a council decision to approve removal of three trees on Royal Avenue.Fathers wasn’t part of the Jan. 24 decision, but has since spoken out against it. While some may disagree, the history behind the issue is irrelevant when considering what happened Friday.Whatever the motive, the act is reprehensible.But if the incident was, in fact, targeted at Fathers because of her stand on any civic issue, there should be greater concern and even less tolerance.There is a process in place for voicing discontent with all levels of government in Canada. At the grassroots level, concerned citizens may approach elected individuals for one-on-one conversations. At the other end of the spectrum, when it is felt government has overstepped its authority, the ombudsman may become involved. Elections, such as the civic one coming up this November, are another definitive place to express disapproval.In White Rock, citizens have used a variety of methods to speak out. They have petitioned and written letters; they have phoned individual councillors, applied for delegations and stood up during question period.There is little doubt that not all who have raised their voice – on any matter – have come away completely satisfied, and no doubt emotions are high when it comes to the Royal Avenue trees.But it doesn’t change the fact that whatever the issue is, there is no excuse for destruction or personal attacks. Dissatisfaction with the system – whether it is with municipal government, the health authority or any other political body – should never be expressed with violence.And just as harsher punishments are rendered against those responsible for crimes against those who serve and protect us in the police force, so too must be the case for those who take their frustrations out on our elected officials.Those responsible for ever choosing such a path should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.
