Sudan has been bombing South Sudan again, only a couple of months after the two countries split apart.
Sudan is mostly Muslim and South Sudan is predominantly Christian — but the quarrel is about oil, not religion.
Yet, it is really about religion, too, since the two countries would never have split apart along the current border if not for the religious divide.
Ivory Coast was split along the same Muslim-Christian lines for nine years, although the shooting ended last year and there is an attempt underway to sew the country back together under an elected government.
But, in Nigeria, Africa’s biggest country by far, the situation is going from bad to worse, with the Islamist terrorists of Boko Haram murdering people all over the country in the name of imposing sharia law on the entire nation.
“The situation we have in our hands is even worse than the civil war that we fought [in 1967-1970, which killed between one- and three-million people],” said President Goodluck Jonathan.
That’s a major exaggeration — the current death toll in Nigeria from terrorist attacks and army reprisals is probably only a few hundred a month — but the potential for much greater slaughter is certainly there.
In an interview with Reuters, Jonathan said: “If [Boko Haram] clearly identify themselves now and say . . . this is the reason why we are confronting government or this is the reason why we destroyed some innocent people and their properties, why not [talk to them]?”
But, it’s pointless: He already knows who they are and what they want.
“Boko Haram,” loosely translated, means “Western education is forbidden,” and the organization’s declared aim is to overthrow the government and impose Islamic law on all of Nigeria.
In a 40-minute audio message posted on YouTube two weeks ago, the group’s leader, Abubakar Shekau, threatened his next step would be to carry out a bombing campaign against Nigeria’s secondary schools and universities.
This is not only vicious, it is also completely loony. There is no way Boko Haram could conquer the entire country.
Only half of Nigerians are Muslims and they are much poorer than the country’s 80-million Christians.
The Christian south is where the oil is — and the ports and most of the industry, so that’s where most of the money is, too.
The same pattern is repeated in many other African countries: Poor Muslim north, prosperous Christian south.
There was no plan behind this.
Islam spread slowly south from North Africa, which was conquered by Arab armies in the seventh century, while Christianity spread rapidly inland once European colonies appeared on the African coast in the last few hundred years.
The line where Islam and Christianity meet runs across Africa about 1,100 kilometres north of the equator (except in Ethiopia, where the Christians have the highlands and the Muslims the lowlands).
In general, the Muslims ended up with the desert and semi-desert regions of Africa because Islam had to make it all the way across the Sahara, while the more fertile and richer regions nearer to the equator and all the way down to South Africa are mainly Christian because the Europeans arrived by sea with much greater economic and military power.
But, some 350-million Africans live in countries that straddle the Christian-Muslim fault line.
There probably won’t be a full-scale civil war in Nigeria this time around, but Boko Haram is targeting Christians indiscriminately.
The Nigerian army, not known for its discipline and restraint, is almost as indiscriminate in targeting devout but innocent Muslims in the northern states that are home to the terrorist organization. Christians are already moving out of the north and Muslims out of the south.
It will get worse in Nigeria and it is getting bad again in what used to be Sudan — and Ethiopia is an accident just waiting to happen.
Even Ivory Coast may not really be out of the woods yet.
There is a small but real risk these conflicts could some day coalesce into a general Muslim-Christian confrontation that would kill millions and convulse all of Africa.
Christianity and Islam have been at war most of the time since Muslim armies conquered half of the then-Christian world, from Syria to Spain, in the seventh and eighth centuries.
There was the great Christian counter-attack of the Crusades in the 12th century, the Muslim conquest of Turkey and the Balkans in the 15th and 16th centuries and the European conquest of almost the entire Muslim world in the 18th to 20th centuries.
It is a miserable history and, in some places, it is likely to continue for some time to come.
But nowhere in sub-Saharan Africa does the frontier between Muslim-majority and Christian-majority areas derive from conquest: These populations are not looking for revenge.
Boko Haram’s style of radical Islamism is an import from somewhere else and it would be a terrible mistake for large numbers of Muslim Nigerians to embrace it.
On the other hand, it will be a terrible mistake if Nigeria doesn’t get a chokechain on its army, whose brutal actions are all too likely to drive Nigerian Muslims in exactly that direction.
-Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.
