To the editor:
On Sept. 7, some areas of the South Cariboo Regional District will be asked to vote on Bylaw #4837 to increase taxes for recreation services, including arts and culture services in 100 Mile House.
Currently, the District of 100 Mile House supplies these services and feel a large majority of users are from outside the 100 Mile House area and they should share in the maintenance of facilities, such as Martin Exeter Hall and the soccer fields.
I have two problems with this bylaw. I feel the business community in 100 Mile House benefit from events held at these various recreation programs in town.
The most important problem with this bylaw is taxpayers living outside of town do not vote for mayor or councillors, although the Cariboo Regional District directors sit on a joint committee in these decisions.
The ultimate responsibility of the elected officials of 100 Mile House is to look after their taxpayers and I applaud them for this. 100 Mile House project the cost of maintaining the soccer fields at $70,000, which leaves $230,000 to maintain Martin Exeter Hall.
A private contractor can maintain the soccer fields for considerably less and $230,000 seems excessive for Martin Exeter Hall.
When the society representing the Stan Halcro Arena made inquiries about funding assistance, they were rightfully told the users should step up and contribute if they wanted the arena saved, and they did.
Should not the same apply to Martin Exeter Hall? Bylaw #4837 is taxation without representation. How often do you get to say no to increased taxes? Now is your chance vote no to increased taxes, and vote no to bylaw #4837.
Peter Reid
103 Mile
